In many churches this weekend, Ephesians 2:11-22 will be
read at worship. Verse 15 is especially noteworthy: “…by abolishing the law of
commandments expressed in ordinances, that he (Jesus) might create in himself
one new man in place of the two, so making peace…” (ESV)
Undoubtedly many will interpret the above text to say that
Jesus has abolished God’s moral law and, therefore, we are welcome to live as
we please. Let us sin boldly so that grace may abound! Those with more sense will say that Jesus has indeed abolished the law and we can live as we please, but only insofar
as we don’t violate the law of love.
That’s true, so far as it goes. But those who offer this interpretation seem to have trouble defining the law of love. The question that
needs to be answered is this: Can we violate the moral law of God (e.g. “You shall not murder, commit adultery, steal,
covet, etc.”) and still fulfill the law of love? In other words, can
we murder, fornicate, steal, covet, etc., and still be loving people? The
answer is obvious: By no means!
Three Types of Law: Moral, Civil, and Ceremonial
Then what law did Jesus abolish? If not the moral law of the
Ten Commandments, then what law is Ephesians talking about? It is helpful to
note that three types of laws are present in the Old Testament: moral, civil,
and ceremonial.
God’s moral law is that which pertains to right and
wrong, good and evil. That law has not been abolished by Jesus. I will
return to its place in the Christian life toward the end of this post, but for
now it suffices to say that Ephesians is not talking about God’s moral law. It speaks of a law that put a barrier between Jews and Gentiles. (Reading
the entire passage shows this.) God’s moral law did not erect any such barrier.
It always has been, and always will be, universal.
There is also God’s civil law, which was meant to govern
ancient Israel. That type of law was strictly for that people and that time
period. That's why Christians don't stone people to death, for example, even though the Old Testament civil law calls for it on certain occasions (e.g. Deuteronomy 17:5).
God’s ceremonial law, meanwhile, was meant to instruct ancient Israel
in worship. The ultimate purpose of that ceremonial law – and this is worth
emphasizing – was to foreshadow Jesus
Christ. For example, the unblemished Passover lamb (Exodus 12) was meant to point to Jesus, the “lamb of God who takes away the sin of the
world.” (John 1:29)
Ephesians Speaks of Ceremonial Law
Now here's the main argument of this post: This is the type of law that was abolished by Jesus. Since
the ceremonial law was a foreshadowing of Christ, it is no longer needed. Once the reality has come, we don’t need to follow the shadows anymore.
Yes, the shadows can certainly be helpful in understanding more fully who Jesus
is and what he came to do, but they’re not to form the basis of our identity.
The Ephesians passage in question speaks of the abolishment not
of God’s moral law (as some would have it), but of the ceremonial law. That’s why Christians don’t need
to be circumcised (that’s a ceremonial law that pointed to the circumcision of
heart wrought by Jesus), but do need to refrain from fornication and robbery
(those are moral laws, which the Spirit of Jesus does not abolish but actually writes
on a believer’s heart).
The Role of God’s Moral Law Among Christians
If Jesus does not abolish God’s moral law, then
what role does that law have in the Christian life? Three. One is to
restrain sinful inclinations, much like a dam restrains the flow of a river. (Timothy 1:9-10.) Another is to reveal one’s own sinfulness, much like an internal mirror showing
us the blemishes of sin on our hearts. (Romans 7:7-13)
A third and final function of God’s moral law is to instruct
a believer in true righteousness and holiness. (Notice how so many of Paul's letters begin by proclaiming the gospel and then conclude by commanding moral obedience. Those commandments are examples of this third use of the law.) Put simply, a Christian doesn't get to make up the kind
of righteousness he practices. Instead, God commands a particular kind.
And,
among the elect, God not only commands his moral law but also writes
it on their heart so that obedience happens freely
and joyfully. (Jeremiah 31:31-34 is worth reading. “I will put my law within
them…”) This obedience is certainly not the cause of a believer's righteousness before God, but it is the necessary effect and shape of it.
Last Word
For anyone who would interpret Ephesians 2:1-22 as an abolishment
of God’s moral law, I hope the above points would give pause. And if they don't,
let Scripture interpret Scripture, and let Jesus’ own words in Matthew govern
our interpretation of Ephesians:
“Do not think that I have come to abolish the
Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. For
truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot,
will pass from the Law until all is accomplished. Therefore whoever relaxes one
of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be
called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever does them and teaches them
will be called great in the kingdom of heaven.” - Matthew 5:17-19
Well, pastor, I love your explanation on these crucial matters. Yes, the entire 10 Commandments are abiding forever. However, I assume a lot of people tend to turn a blind eye to Fourth Commandment, the Sabbath Commandment (Saturday), in particular. So, I wonder "Are they correct on this?" Is the Seventh-day Sabbath (Saturday) abolished? What do you say, pastor?
ReplyDelete